August 2022

VOlUME 05 ISSUE 08 AUGUST 2022
A Comparative Study on the English Achievement of Students in Limited Face-to-Face Class Intervention versus Modular Distance Learning
1Princess Aloha T. Arroyo, 2Rohilmina Y. Nasilon, 3Shermalyn G. Alamsahi, 4Jayson V. Alviar
1,2,3,4Senior High School Department, Tairan National High School, MBHTE-Basilan, BARMM, Philippines,7301.
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i8-22

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

This study aimed to determine the impact of the limited face-to-face class intervention on the achievements of students in English 7. A Post-Test Only Non-equivalence Groups Design was used. A total of twenty-four (24) respondents were conveniently chosen wherein twelve (12) of these respondents attended the English intervention using the modules and the other twelve (12) were exposed to modular print only. The Mann Whitney U test result (U = 114: p = .01581), indicates that the Limited Intervention Group (LIG) performs significantly better with the higher average rank of 16 compared to the Modular Print Group (MPG) with an average rank of 9. Comparing the achievement level through the Mean Percentage Scores (MPS), it appears that the MPS of LIG is relatively higher than the MPG by 12.90%, indicating that limited intervention can improve students’ English proficiency. Furthermore, the students in the LIG expressed a strong positive attitude towards the limited face-to-face class intervention.

KEYWORDS:

Achievement, English Proficiency, Limited Face-to-Face Class Intervention, Mean Percentage Score, Modular Distance Learning.

REFERENCES

1) Azim Premji University . (2021). Loss of Learning during the Pandemic. Azim Premji University . Field Studies in Education.

2) Bansal, P., & Deepika. (n.d.). THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ENGLISH REMEDIAL PROGRAM: A CASE STUDY. Government College of Education, Chandigarh. Retrieved February 27, 2022

3) Briones, L. M. (2020). SHARED RESPONSIBILITY: Recommendation on Limited Face-to-Face. Department of Education. Retrieved February 27, 2022, from https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/20201214-Recommendation-on-Face-to-Face-Classes-Final-1.pdf

4) Cahyani, A. W. (2019, August 2). Students’ Perception on Remedial Semester in Department of English Education at Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

5) Chin, M. (2020, October 11). Unique Philippines. Retrieved April 27, 2021, from Unique Philippines: http:/www.uniquephilippine.com/students-new-normal-modular-distance-learning/

6) Coleman, H. (2010). The English Language in Development. British Council.

7) Conjointly. (n.d.). Retrieved 12 15, 2021, from https://conjointly.com/kb/descriptive-statistics/

8) Cook, T., & Campbell, D. (1979). Quasi-experimentation:Design & analysis issues in field settings. Houghton Mifflin.

9) Corona-Verbosidad, A. B. (2019, December). THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE REMEDIAL INSTRUCTION. Luz Y Saber, 13(4), 92-117.

10) Edd, G. (2021). DePed to tap social media platforms, use "honesty" pledges vs "online kopyahan". Retrieved october 2021, from https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2021/09/22/2128946/deped-tap-social-media-platforms-use-honsty-pledges-vs-online-kopyahan

11) Engzell, P., Frey, A., & Verhagen, M. D. (2021, April 27). Learning loss due to school closures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), 118(17). doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2022376118

12) Face-to-Face Learning. (2017). Retrieved October 24, 2021, from https://www.colleges.co.za/face-to-face-learning

13) Institute for Digital Research and Education Statistical Consulting. (2020, dec 17). Retrieved from https://stats.idre.ucla.edu/spss/faq/what-does-cronbachs-alpha-mean/#:~:text=The%20alpha%20coefficient%20for%20the,most%20social%20science%20research%20situations.)

14) Louche, T. O. (2014, October 7). The Impact of Remedial English on the Improvement of EnglishProfi ciency: The Case of the United States International University-Africa. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 1178-1188. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.296

15) Maawa, P. K., & Ortega-Dela Cruz, R. (2019). REMEDIAL AND CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVING STUDENTS’ ENGLISH LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY. International Journal of Language Education, 3(1), 1-11. doi: 10.26858/ijole.v1i1.7794

16) Sarao, Z. (2021). DepEd releases memo on pilot run of face-to-face classes. Inquirer.Net. Retrieved February 27, 2022, from https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1503553/deped-releases-memo-on-pilot-run-of-face-to-face-classes

17) Satriani, E. (2018, AUGUST). READING COMPREHENSION DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTERED BY ENGLISH STUDENTS OF ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OF RIAU. J-SHMIC Journal of English for Academic 5(2), vol5(2).1885, 15. doi:10.25299/jshmic.2018

18) Save the Children. (n.d.). Save the Children. Retrieved February 27, 2022, from Save the Children Organization: https://www.savethechildren.org/us/charity-stories/learning-loss

19) UNICEF. (2022). Learning loss must be recovered to avoid long-term damage to children’s wellbeing and productivity, new report says. Retrieved February 27, 2022, from https://www.unicef.org/philippines/press-releases/learning-loss-must-be-recovered-avoid-long-term-damage-childrens-wellbeing-and

VOlUME 05 ISSUE 08 AUGUST 2022

Indexed In

Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar